Use an editor to spell check essay.
Hire Writer This was a poster produced by the North Vietnamese; and was aimed at persuading the South Vietnamese that guerrilla tactics were effective. It is unlikely that the American public would have seen this poster on the television or in the media elsewhere.
This poster therefore indicates that it was the tactics used by the Communists and their refusal to give in to a greater military force, rather than the power of television that lost the war. For these reasons this source does not support the statement above.
Source E is a photograph published during the Vietnam War and shows children suffering from a Napalm attack. I know that Napalm was a widely used chemical weapon, and used to flush out guerrillas hiding in the jungles.
As well as destroying forests, it also burnt through the skin to the bone, and killed many civilians. This photograph in particular became one of the most enduring images of the war.
Similar disturbing images would have been beamed back to America, where they would have been seen on television. Such scenes were likely to cause more anti-war feeling in America. Source F is written by a journalist in and gives an American view of fighting guerrillas. It questions the way in which American soldiers are fighting the war, and implies that the Americans are in a moral dilemma.
He gives a sense of the fear of the soldiers, as he graphically describes a guerrilla throwing mortar, killing and injuring soldiers. I am aware that this was a situation faced almost daily by the Americans in Vietnam. The source continues in a contrasting way, questioning the way America was morally justified.
This could have made people reading this article question the morals of the war, however as it was not on television, this source fails to support the interpretation above. Source G tells us about the aftermath of the My Lai massacre of It gives the reaction of an American soldier having just been told about the My Lai massacre.
The soldier compares his comrades involved in the massacre to Nazis. I know that the My Lai massacre destroyed the ancient city, and killed around civilians, mostly women, children and elderly men.
The 48th Viet Cong Battalion — the intended target of the mission — was nowhere to be seen. Not a shot was fired at the US army during this mission. I am aware that it took over a year for the truth about what happened at My Lai to be uncovered and reported back home.
When Americans heard about My Lai it had a huge impact on the anti-war feeling in America. American opinion had become increasingly divided after the TET offensive, which took place a year before the revelations of My Lai.
My Lai brought about more public attention, and confirmed for many Americans that this was not a war America should be involved in.
Now, public opinion started to favour peace in Vietnam. It is unclear whether this particular source was shown on TV in the form of an interview or published after the war. However similar interviews would have been viewed on screen and had a devastating effect on the American support for the war.
Source H illustrates the costs of the war. I know that the Great Society was aimed to tackle social injustice and poverty, and improve health care and education. As billions and billions of US tax dollars began to be pumped into the war, less and less money was going into education and health care.
America hadsoldiers in Vietnam, at a cost of 2 billion dollars every month. This source is unlikely to have been seen in America.
I believe that this source does not support the statement because it could be that the lack of public spending in America was a more significant reason for the anti-war movement, rather than the impact of television.
Source J is a photograph of an anti-war demonstration at Kent State University in I am aware that the protest was broken up by the National Guard, and four students were killed.
Many were horrified by what had happened. The demonstration took place after the announcement of the invasion of Cambodia. Nixon had promised to withdraw troops with Vietnam; this latest news had given America the impression that Nixon was expanding a war already lost.
Incidents such as the TET offensive being covered by television meant that some Americans were turning against military involvement in Vietnam.
Source J reflects the changing attitudes in America which could be because of this television coverage.Australia and the Vietnam War Essay - The Vietnam War, a counter-insurgency conflict waged between North Vietnamese Communist forces and their South Vietnamese opposition, was one that many of its participants are not like to forget.
The French were involved in a war of Indochina prior to the American involvement. Trace the causes of this conflict and describe the key events and general course of the French Indochina War.
Traditionally, the First Indochina war started in the French Indochina in and ended in Bavendam research papers essay for english distinctly visual essay architect essay unique experiences for college essays essay pros and cons of social networking, essay on our society today more closely reflects essay on lal bahadur shastri jayantilal, paul pillar intelligence policy and the war in iraq essays ga 68 dotatate synthesis essay.
The Vietnam War was a military struggle starting in and ending in The conduct and progress of the war had both Australia and America involved, their involvement however raised many questions and doubts, which was then cleared by a diversity aftermath, mostly impacting the country and people of Vietnam.
Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War was a result of a combined fear of communism and the fall of freedom from danger in Australian democracy and society.
The Vietnam War was different from any other battle fought in the history of mankind. Unlike other wars this confrontation was not engaged in order to conquer but to reform. Greed and desire which are the usual elements that spur wars into existence we 5/5(6).